Search For Steiff Classic Teddy Bear Brass at Amazon
| Most helpful customer reviews |
| Most helpful customer reviews |
Look For Gund Career Lifestyles Collectible Doctor at Amazon Most helpful customer reviews 0 of 0 people found the following review helpful. 0 of 0 people found the following review helpful. i would recommend it for anyone |
Find Freddy Bear The Teddy at Amazon Most helpful customer reviews 15 of 15 people found the following review helpful. 8 of 8 people found the following review helpful. 7 of 7 people found the following review helpful. |
Find Shadow Puppets Ender Book 7 at Amazon Most helpful customer reviews 41 of 44 people found the following review helpful. Here we find Bean growing beyond the norm, symptomatic of his genetic flaw that will eventually kill him while still a young man. And growing in other ways, as his relationship with Petra finally flowers under her tenacious insistence. This is probably the best part of this novel, as we see sides of the two that have not been in great evidence in the prior works. And we get some small looks into the thoughts and characters of some of the other Battle School graduates, mainly Virlomi, Han Tzu and Alai, each of whom contribute some major items towards Peter and Bean winning their current battle with Achilles. The Wiggin parents emerge from obscurity and are revealed to be (unsurprisingly) very intelligent and (surprisingly) quite forceful. All good things…
So where does this book fail? The main failure is Peter Wiggin himself. For a man who could sway world opinion with his exacting, careful logic as Locke and browbeat everyone into emotional frenzy as Demosthenes, Peter is depicted here as a remarkably stupid, arrogant, and emotional teenager. Achilles, the demon, remains almost totally offstage, providing little room for dramatic confrontations, and what ones there are come off as almost anti-climatic. And finally, the circumstance that draws Bean back into the struggle between Peter and Achilles was totally preventable, a very sad and uncharacteristic lack of foresight by both Bean and Petra. These items do much to kill any major excitement in this work, even though the major (world) battle could have formed a taught political and military thriller.
Is this book readable? Certainly. Card is still an excellent writer. His prose, descriptions, and dialogue (especially the back-and-forth between Bean and Petra) are all well formed and his moral insights flow from the premise of the story. But this one just doesn’t have the edge-of-the-seat tension, the incredible insight into human character that have been the hallmarks of his best work. 26 of 28 people found the following review helpful. But while Ender’s Game was spectacular, Ender’s Shadow great, and Shadow of the Hegemon good, I thought Shadow puppets was way below my expectations.
Everything felt tired, boring, and predictable. As with the later books in the Ender series, It seemed as though there wasn’t enough plot to stretch across the pages.
Bean and Petra’s characters seemed to change radically from Shadow of the Hegemon and Ender’s Shadow with no explanation. I also was disapointed in the dialogue. People said things rather abruptly and for no reason. Bean and Petra’s romance also seemed very awkward with no excitement at all.
And where was Achilles? His great chapters with Petra made me forgive some of Shadow of the Hegemon’s boring parts.
But as a loyal fan, I still give it 3 stars because it kinda satisfied my longing for another Ender book. It’s great for fans, but I wouldn’t really recomned it. 23 of 25 people found the following review helpful. “Shadow Puppets” should probably be the end, though. Much like the last portion of “Xenocide” and all of “Children of the Mind” in the original ‘Ender’s Quartet’, Orson Scott Card seems to be running out of steam with these characters. Card still displays his gifts of representing human interactions, but “Shadow Puppets” has less ability to stand on it’s own. Unlike “Ender’s Shadow” and, to a slightly lesser degree, “Shadow of the Hegemon”, you absolutely have to have read the previous books in the series for “Shadow Puppets” to have any true meaning. Whereas “Ender’s Shadow” and “Shadow of the Hegemon” were connected by similar characters, yet told different stories (much like “Ender’s Game” and “Speaker for the Dead”), “Shadow Puppets” merely continues the storyline from “…Hegemon”. To summarize, Peter Wiggin has achieved his long sought after goal of becoming the Hegemon, but the title carries little power with it in the wake of a large Chinese invasion throughout southern Asia, and subsequent assumption of the position of Earth’s premier military power. These actions were set in motion by the psychotic Achilles before his true nature came to light and he was placed under arrest by the Chinese government. Peter sees his only true way of thwarting the Chinese and restoring prestige to the office of the Hegemon is to rescue Achilles from prison and put him to work for the Hegemony. Think that, despite Achilles manipulative skills, he can control him, Peter mistakenly compromises his own security and drives away many of those who served him, including Bean and Petra. During their self-imposed exile from Hegemon, Bean and Petra try to find ways to undermine the Chinese and Achilles while also dealing with a burgeoning romance and Petra’s desire to have children by Bean before he dies of his genetic disorder. While it is somewhat interesting to read about Bean and Petra’s romance, it is still somewhat dry. It’s not impossible to conceive of this happening, as they are both probably 16 years old at this point and far older in many other ways, given what their early years consisted of. Yet, there’s not really any spark to the relationship. It seems to the reader as if they are having this romance because they feel that it’s something that they should do, not because there is any passionate romantic feelings sparking between them. It can’t carry near the same weight as the personal interactions and tender romance that took place in “Speaker for the Dead”. That example is just thrown in as a perfect representation of Card’s ability to convey human emotion. It’s not quite as well-crafted here. It’s not bad, though, so the reader still has some emotional investment in these two. There are other elements of “Shadow Puppets” that are quite interesting. For the first time in all seven of the “Ender’s” novels, the reader gets a chance to truly see the personalities of Theresa and John Paul Wiggins, the parents of Peter, Ender and Valentine. A great deal of time is spent on Peter’s reluctant interaction with his parents and his eventual acceptance of their advice as relevant and appreciated. They come across as so much more than the bland, inattentive parents that readers were first introduced to in “Ender’s Game”. In addition, there are interactions with many other former Battle School students. Alai and Han Tzu are just a few of the names who play major roles in the events that shape this novel. On the whole “Shadow Puppets” was a good read. If there are more books on the horizon, then all the better. However, if this is where the series ends, then so be it. It’s not a bad way to go out. |
Edward Gorey Plays Cape Cod at Amazon Most helpful customer reviews 4 of 4 people found the following review helpful. I’m using this as a segway to Verburg’s new mystery Croaked: an Edgar Rowdey Cape Cod Mystery, about a writer of small, creepy little books turned detective… 2 of 3 people found the following review helpful. 1 of 2 people found the following review helpful. |
My Mistakes Were Made You at Amazon
Do you have a humans pleaser personality? Have you ever been in a circumstance where you begin to wonder whether other people’s expected values of you exceed your capacity or willingness to deliver? Of course you have! Silly question – unless you’re one of those super-humans who recognise how to say no without saying no. BIRTH ORDER AND SELF Thing is, there’s a limit to what you may do, isn’t there? I’m one of the sandwich generation so I have both young grandchildren for whom I care twice a week whilst my daughter teaches, and parents, with respective health issues, who also require a degree of support. In addition, I job-share with my husband – that’s how we make our living – and I write. When I went down with ‘Female Flu’ a couple of weeks ago (so much worse than the Man Flu variety, because you have to keep going) I managed to keep most of the balls in the air, but numerous plainly had to be dropped. So when I found myself expected to take on a family dedication at the weekend when I might, otherwise, have given myself galore me-time to recharge my batteries, I wasn’t incisively delighted. I recognise a great deal of persons recognise how to say no without saying no. I’m plainly not one of them. Besides, I’m in that unenviable position of being a firstborn child. SIBLING POSITION According to the Wikipedia website, one of the original persons to suggest that birth order has an effect on personality was an Austrian psychiatrist, Alfred Adler. A contemporary of Sigmund Freud and Carl Jung, he argued that the way in which each of us tackles the major distinct elements of life – friendship, love and work – is principally influenced by our birth order in the family. Now I know there are those who passionately believe in basi child syndrome and others who feel there’s not one thing in it. Advocates tell apart the following traits in the oldest child in a family, by saying they are:
PEOPLE PLEASER? Do you – if you are a primary child – cohere to those characteristics? Do you, for instance, have a humans pleaser personality? Have you high expected values of yourself? Are you in continuous need of assurance that you’re fulfilling what’s expected of you? To my mind, there are arguments for and against. The gap amid sibs will have to play a part, surely? If the oldest is at school, or has left home before the next one arrives, what then? The oldest would have been an only child prior to reaching school age and would, in effect, proceed in that vein. And what if there’s a dissimilar combining of genders? Say a girl followed by assorted boys. Or vice versa: a couple of girls followed by a single boy? I can’t believe that the same principles hold for all scenarios. ARE ALL ELDEST CHILDREN HIGH ACHIEVERS? It seems to be widely accepted that the introductory baby to be born into a family will grow up with a tendency to be analytical, organized and high achieving. Whether each introductory adheres to these traits is debatable, not least because as a firstborn, myself, I show none of these traits. Creative, naturally flexible and spontaneous (though I’ve disciplined myself to be orderly where to be other than as supposed or expected causes me grief) my only accomplishment was a No. 4 bestseller – and that crept up on me unawares! The familyrappwebsite continues, with the following statement this child values control and once again this is the very opposite of my personality. Perhaps there’s something my parents aren’t telling me, and I’m not actually the oldest child in our family? RESPONSIBLE I have surely never had any desire to be a leader of anything whatever! As an author my interests and pursuits are those of an introvert. I could, however, be described as self-sufficient, am conscientious, a perfectionist and have high expected values of myself – peculiarly when it comes to sentiment responsible for the welfare and concordance of my family. The sticking plaster mentality is probably true of a lot of women. For me it’s – well – sort of stuck into my personality. If someone’s hurt or in need, I suppose I see myself as the one who has to tend and cover the wound! Which is why I find it so difficult to say no and mean no. It doesn’t live up to people’s expected values of me, you see. Nor, of course, my own. UNDERSTANDING SIBLING RIVALRY I suspect that the whole oldest child syndrome is, actually, the result of how firstborns in the family are treated, and what expected values are made of them. ‘Now you be a good boy/girl, and look after your little brother/sister’ is the usual mantra. My parents told me – on the one occasion I tried to stick out for something I believed in that went right versus what they were asking of me – that my acquiescence had been taken as read. They merely never expected me to oppose them and were shocked and injure that I ought to do so. All of which leads me to believe that oldest child syndrome is less to do with the innate personality of a original born child, and more to do with conditioning by parents and other adults. Perhaps if we take a look at middle child syndrome next week that will disclose more? Most helpful customer reviews |